truthaction.org Forum Index truthaction.org
9/11 TRUTH NOW
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

We Are Change LA Serves Joe Biden with Thermite Paper

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
President Ford



Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 627
Location: Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:46 pm    Post subject: We Are Change LA Serves Joe Biden with Thermite Paper Reply with quote



Way to go Jeremy and Bruno!!! Looks like you touched a nerve. Very Happy

Archived:
http://visibility911.com/media/?p=589
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Arcterus



Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 748
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 10:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"...Yes...*walks off*"

Made me laugh.

I don't like though how right after that he insinuates that Biden is part of the 9/11 cover up. Making quick assertions like that undermines your credibility in the audience around you. Keeping with the questioning of whether or not they'll conduct an investigation or not would have been better, I think.
_________________
http://arcterus911.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
YT



Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5918
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Screenshots of the historic moment, posted by Aidan Monaghan at 911Blogger:

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Scott N



Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 1534

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

I don't like though how right after that he insinuates that Biden is part of the 9/11 cover up.


Well, he is the Vice President of the frickin' United States, and it has been 8 years. If a blue-collar worker like me can find out the basic facts about 911 then surely the VP with his team of PR representatives and researchers can do same.

Let's not kid ourselves here. I'd be willing to venture that virtually the entire US government knows the score on 911. Politicians are rightly regarded as sniveling little bastards with no decency (as a rule Wink, but they are human and therefore possess the basic human trait of curiosity.

A simple search on Google and the truth is there for all to see.

Considering the pattern of many confrontations we've seen in the past ("you're a shill for the New World Order!" -- cathartic maybe, but not very effective) I think "Shumonik" did a fantastic job. Very poised, laid out the facts, left Biden with no alternative but to run and hide.

I think this confrontation is a landmark.

I do have a problem with the word "traitor" though. Traditionally this epithet has been used against some of the finest people who ever lived, from Emma Goldman to Einstein to Big Bill Haywood to Mark Twain.

Explaining his writings during the birth of the American empire in the Philippines, Mark Twain wrote that “My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one's country, not to its institutions or its office-holders.” Decades later, George Orwell came to a similar conclusion: that “Patriotism is a devotion to a certain place and people, contrary to nationalism which is inseparable from lust for power.”

I understand the utility of using the word "traitor" against politicians in the context of 911, but it's a dangerous game. I'd rather be a traitor to my state than the human race. When I hear the word "traitor" I think of firing squads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 2189
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arcterus raises an uncomfortable point that I've address on many occasions. There are best practices for this sort of thing.

I'm not really knocking Bruno or Jeremy. By relative standards that confrontation didn't go so bad. I've been a lot more frustrated by others. But I've thought for some time that WAC and the movement would benefit greatly from developing and promoting strategic guidelines for these confrontations?

Some of the confrontations have had a solid premise. Presenting something. Asking a question. This one seemed to make sense. But in many cases the people involved lose their cool and decide to express personal feelings that greatly detract from the outcome.

Did I miss the guidelines? Did lots of WAC people miss it too? Why can't this issue keep moving toward some kind of resolution? Or are people actively avoiding it?
_________________
http://911truthburnout.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
YT



Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5918
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is pretty major stuff, guys. I'm all for the critiquing of actions in an effort to mutually improve and there's nothing that you're saying that I disagree with but it seems the momentousness of this action is being ignored in lieu of registering some fairly standard complaints.

They got the Active Thermitic Materials paper into the hands of the Vice President of the United States of America and asked him some highly relevant questions regarding its implications in front of a whole slew of news teams. Jivin' Joe was speechless and visibly impacted. This is a historic moment.

Could it have been better? Of course - just about any action could be - and that's why criticism is important. But good criticism doesn't ignore the successes - in this case, the exceedingly blatant win of this action.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
YT



Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5918
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeremy writes:

Quote:
A little post-encounter analysis has led me to think that if I had shut my mouth after the first question, more could have been revealed and the tension could have grown in a creative way. I don't apologize at all for what I said as he left (it was as soft as I could be considering the lives ended and or affected by this ongoing silence and cover-up), but I do see the possibility of further heightening the encounter through restraint, emotional discipline and a reaching out to all the people present. Bruno and I have discussed this in the time since.


http://911blogger.com/node/20131#comment-208452
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GroundZero



Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
Location: Jersey City, NJ

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great job you guys! For all the latest, check out my blog http://www.crotchshotradio.com.

Louie and I have this confrontation up and
we are ahead of infowars by 48 hours usually!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Scott N



Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 1534

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YT wrote:
This is pretty major stuff, guys. I'm all for the critiquing of actions in an effort to mutually improve and there's nothing that you're saying that I disagree with but it seems the momentousness of this action is being ignored in lieu of registering some fairly standard complaints.

They got the Active Thermitic Materials paper into the hands of the Vice President of the United States of America and asked him some highly relevant questions regarding its implications in front of a whole slew of news teams. Jivin' Joe was speechless and visibly impacted. This is a historic moment.

Could it have been better? Of course - just about any action could be - and that's why criticism is important. But good criticism doesn't ignore the successes - in this case, the exceedingly blatant win of this action.


Yes. Well said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 2189
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A little post-encounter analysis has led me to think that if I had shut my mouth after the first question, more could have been revealed and the tension could have grown in a creative way. I don't apologize at all for what I said as he left (it was as soft as I could be considering the lives ended and or affected by this ongoing silence and cover-up), but I do see the possibility of further heightening the encounter through restraint, emotional discipline and a reaching out to all the people present. Bruno and I have discussed this in the time since.


That's exactly what I was talking about, and in the most constructive tone I could muster. Jeremy is a really thoughtful guy and his concerns above very clearly demonstrate the kind of self reflection and strategic growth that we don't see often enough. That's also a victory of sorts in my eyes relative to my concerns.

Just because I didn't list off the reasons why this was a good thing doesn't mean I can't see that. I understand that we need to take encouragement where we can get it. But post game analysis, if you will, is also really important as suggested above.

The thing I like most about this action is the fact that many people seem to be trying really hard to bury the thermite paper, and these guyes raised the issue in front of a lot of people who can now never claim they haven't heard of it. That's a functional result.
_________________
http://911truthburnout.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
element



Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too agree with Jeremy's post-encounter analysis. It would have been better if he'd have left his prior question -- which was open ended - lingering in the air for Biden to respond to instead of giving him a much easier yes/no question. Hindsight is 20/20 though, of course. What's most important is that Biden has now officially been presented with this evidence and cannot claim ignorance of it. I applaud Jeremy's very good work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scout



Joined: 16 May 2009
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: ..... Reply with quote

Way

To

Go


Nicely done gentlemen - thats was cool. Very Happy

xxxxx
_________________
Smile Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
victronix01



Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 1958

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, it was neat to see this, having done so much internet work to promote this paper, to see it in his hands was historic. Seeing that, I lost interest in the words anyone was or wasn't saying. It's out there now, you can never undo that. He will be judged by such details in history.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arcterus



Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 748
Location: New York

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By no means do I intend to belittle the actions of WAC here, nor do I mean to defend Biden. My only concern was promotional strategy. Keep in mind most of the people here probably like Biden. I think this is a great and monumental move that could've just been handled slightly better. But props to Bruno and Jeremy. It was an excellent confrontation.
_________________
http://arcterus911.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
victronix01



Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 1958

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Related thread here --

My open email to Randi Rhodes regarding my alleged "sandbagging" of the VP on blog-based nano-thermite rumor
http://911blogger.com/node/20137
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group